Legal Opinion

Van Zee v. Reding

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1989No. 16342PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Sylvia Van Zee (Van Zee) appeals the dismissal of a medical malpractice action she brought against Thomas Reding (Red-ing) for allegedly fracturing her finger during physical therapy. Van Zee contends that the trial court erred in dismissing her action on the basis of her failure to retain an expert witness in the case. However, Van Zee has totally ignored the fact that the issue concerning failure to retain an expert witness was raised in a separate motion for summary judgment which was not ruled upon by the trial court. * The motion to dismiss was based upon the failure of Van Zee’s counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anthony Fox v. Studebaker-Worthington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Denton v. Mr. Swiss of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Duncan v. Pennington County Housing AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Schwartzle v. Austin Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. PalachukSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Storm v. DurrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Van Zee v. WitzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Coloni v. Coloni & SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Van Zee v. WitzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API