Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Storm v. Durr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James and Barbara Storm (Storm) brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. Durr and his medical office, Cardiology Associates (Durr), and two other doctors. From the time the complaint was filed on August 21, 2000 until May 29, 2001, Storm acted pro se. Only the suit against Durr and Cardiology Associates remains, the complaints against the other defendants were dismissed with prejudice by stipulation of the parties. The trial court dismissed the suit against Durr for failure to obey court orders regarding discovery and for failure to prosecute the claim. Storm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Anthony Fox v. Studebaker-Worthington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Denton v. Mr. Swiss of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Christiansen v. StrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Osgood v. OsgoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Jenco, Inc. v. United Fire GroupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Johnson v. UPSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Eischen v. Wayne TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Coloni v. Coloni & SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API