Legal Opinion
In Re Thomas F. Deuel, Yue-Sheng Li, Ned R. Siegel and Peter G. Milner
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 28, 1995No. 94-1202PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Thomas F. Deuel, Yue-Sheng Li, Ned R. Siegel, and Peter G. Milner (collectively “Deuel”) appeal from the November 30, 1993 decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirming the examiner’s final rejection of claims 4-7 of application Serial No. 07/542,232, entitled “Heparin-Binding Growth Factor,” as unpatentable on the ground of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (1988). Ex parte Deuel, 33 USPQ2d 1445 (Bd.Pat.App.Int.1993). Because the Board erred in concluding that Deuel’s claims 5 and 7 directed to specific cDNA…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In Re David H. FineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. Alphapharm Pty., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- In Re KubinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.