Legal Opinion

John Rissman & Son v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1926No. 16624. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

On March 20, 1923, Dora Howard and William Howard, plaintiffs in error, were awarded compensation by an arbitrator in the sum of $7.50 a week for 220 weeks under paragraph (c) of section 7 of the Workmen’s Compensation act on account of the accidental death of their daughter, Josephine Howard, who had been previous to her death employed to operate a power-driven sewing machine at the overall factory of John Rissman & Son, defendant in error, in Westville, Illinois, from January, 1920, to August 2, 1920, and that they were entitled to receive from respondent $1035 on March 28, 1923, with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Christ v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. Frankamp v. Fordney HotelMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. King v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Arquin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Loudon v. H. W. Shaull & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API