State v. Curran
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. The defendant was convicted of the crime of seduction and sentenced to the penitentiary for two years. He appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
i ckimiis-al meat /“eduotlon/ — I. The defendant demurred to the indictment on the ground that it “contained no charge of facts as to the means made use of to accomplish intercourse, which are essential to constitute the crime of seduction.”
The charge is that the defendant “unlawfully and feloniously did seduce, carnally know and debauch one Laura E. Herring.” The indictment, we think, is in the usual form and sufficient. The offense is created by statute, and it is sufficient to charge in the words of the statute, unless the words used are such that they do not necessarily charge the *114offense.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevenson v. BelknapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. HavenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bever v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- State v. CrandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- State v. BaldoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.