Legal Opinion

B & B LIVERY, INC. v. Riehl

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 22, 1998No. 97SC391PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

We granted certiorari in Riehl v. B & B Livery, Inc., 944 P.2d 642 (Colo.App.1997), to determine whether a release agreemént read in conjunction with a mandatory warning as provided in section 13-21-119, 5 C.R.S. (1997), is ambiguous under the test established in Heil Valley Ranch v. Simkin, 784 P.2d 781 (Colo.1989).1 Respondent Kathy Riehl initiated proceedings in the Arapahoe County District Court (trial court) seeking damages for injuries suffered while riding a horse rented from petitioner B & B Livery, Inc. (B & B). The trial court granted summary judgment to B & B. On appeal, the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc. v. SimkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Colard v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Cordillera Corp. v. HeardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Cordillera Corp. v. HeardColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Chadwick v. Colt Ross Outfitters, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Rhino Fund, LLLP v. HutchinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Mincin v. Vail Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Cagle v. Mathers Family TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API