Legal Opinion

Heil Valley Ranch, Inc. v. Simkin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1989No. 88SC418PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to decide whether a release or exculpatory agreement purporting to waive “any claim [plaintiff] might state against the [defendant] as a result of physical injury incurred” while horseback riding is clear and unambiguous under Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 376-78 (Colo.1981). The court of appeals held that the agreement in this case, which did not use the word “negligence” in its exculpatory provision, was void because it was ambiguous. Simkin v. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc., 765 P.2d 582, 584-85 (Colo.App.1988). We conclude that a valid release or exculpatory agreement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Harris v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. O'CONNELL v. Walt Disney World CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Berlangieri v. Running Elk Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Chadwick v. Colt Ross Outfitters, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. B & B LIVERY, INC. v. RiehlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API