Legal Opinion

State v. Zamora

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 15, 1991No. 10665-9-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShields, C.J.

Pete B. Zamora, Sr., was charged by information with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver in violation of RCW 69.50.401(a)(l)(i). The jury found him guilty as charged. At sentencing, the court found the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of a school ground. RCW 69.50.435. 1 Mr. Zamora's sentence was not doubled pursuant to RCW 69.50.435, but his standard range sentence was enhanced by 24 months pursuant to RCW 9.94A-.310(5). 2 On appeal, Mr. Zamora contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to establish an intent to deliver, (2) enhancement was improper because he was not charged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Silva-BaltazarWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HaglerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. State v. BridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. DelunaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API