Legal Opinion

State v. Bridge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 7, 1998No. 16440-3-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

— This is an appeal from a second degree burglary conviction. The only evidence linking the defendant, Andrew Genius Bridge, to the burglary was a latent fingerprint found on a tag on a magnetic tool that had been purchased within a month or two before the burglary. The question here is whether the latent fingerprint on this movable object was sufficient to support the burglary conviction. We conclude that it was not and reverse.

FACTS

Between the morning of October 13 and the morning of October 14, 1996, someone broke into Lee Verment’s barn. The burglar entered by destroying the barn door.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. KrollWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Howard Eugene MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Melvin Mikes v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TreatCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. TreatCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. BridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API