Gelles v. Skrotsky
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF RULE 11 SANCTIONS
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff’s Motion for Rehearing (Docket No. 75) and Defendants’s Response in Opposition thereto (Docket No. 79), as well as Defen dants’s Motion for Imposition of Rule 11 Sanctions (Docket No. 73) and Plaintiffs Response and Opposition thereto (Docket No. 82). This Court previously granted Defendants’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 69), instigating the above Motions.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
Motion for Rehearing
The proper standard of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- American Home Assurance Company v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., D/B/A Sales Consultants of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Andersen v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- 942 Penn RR, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025
- DRO 15R LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025
- DRO 15R LLC v. Ajar Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025
- Surfaces, Inc. v. Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2023