Legal Opinion

John O. Roane v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 3, 2000No. 00-5015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims, which held that the method used by the United States Air Force (“Air Force”) in awarding promotions was invalid because it was inconsistent with various statutes and a Depart ment of Defense (“DoD”) Directive. See Roane v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 168 (1996). The Court of Federal Claims awarded reinstatement with back pay to Major John Roane, on the grounds that the Air Force Promotion Review Boards that denied his promotion were illegally constituted. Because the decision of the Court of Federal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ron L. Fluellen,plaintiff-Appellant v. United States,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Walter D. Small v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Roane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Blendu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Campa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API