Blendu v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*544 OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
The court has before it the parties’ Joint Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Question of Liability with Respect to the 1875 Act Lands (Joint Motion or Jt. Mot.), filed on December 1, 2006. The parties cross-move for summary judgment on the question of liability with respect to those claims involving segments of the railroad right-of-way that consist of easements created under the General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of March 3, 1875 (1875 Act), 43 U.S.C. §§ 934-39 (2004). Jt. Mot. 1. The Joint Motion is based on cross-motions for summary judgment previously filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Citizens Against Rails-To-Trails v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Hash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- West Seattle General Hospital, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Blendu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Mills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020