Legal Opinion

State v. Mario Cesar Flores-Gallegos

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 2016No. A16A0339Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and RICKMAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 11, 2016 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A16A0339. THE STATE v. FLORES-GALLEGOS. BO-011C BOGGS, Judge. The State of Georgia appeals from the trial court’s order suppressing Mario Flores-Gallegos’ intoxilyzer test results. The court concluded that Flores-Gallegos “did not give actual, knowing and voluntary consent to the administration of the State’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API