Austin v. City of East Grand Rapids
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Austin brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 arising out of the alleged failure of the City of East Grand Rapids (“City defendant”), East Grand Rapids police officers, Allen Darznieck and Harry Wertman (“City officers” or collectively with the City as the “City defendants”) to bring him before a magistrate without undue delay. Plaintiff has also named defendant Kent County (“the County” or “County defendant”) as a defendant on the basis that he was housed at the Kent County Jail for most, if not all, of the alleged…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. Steiner-Liff Iron and Metal Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Turley v. School Dist. of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989