Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of East Grand Rapids

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 29, 1988No. G87-635PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff David Austin brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 arising out of the alleged failure of the City of East Grand Rapids (“City defendant”), East Grand Rapids police officers, Allen Darznieck and Harry Wertman (“City officers” or collectively with the City as the “City defendants”) to bring him before a magistrate without undue delay. Plaintiff has also named defendant Kent County (“the County” or “County defendant”) as a defendant on the basis that he was housed at the Kent County Jail for most, if not all, of the alleged…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Steiner-Liff Iron and Metal Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
  2. Turley v. School Dist. of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API