Legal Opinion
Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 25, 2012No. C 11-2586 CWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW AND MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (Docket Nos. 18 and 40)
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay have brought a putative class action against Defendants C.R. England, Inc., Opportunity Leasing, Inc. and Horizon Truck Sales and Leasing, LLC, on *1088behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Previously, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claim for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL), for failure to state a claim, and moved…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Stuart M. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gentis v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mark Neubauer v. FedEx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017