Legal Opinion
Harry Robinson and Kay Robinson Eva May McCarthy and George Samuel Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk Ag and Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1995No. 93-5168PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought claims of common law fraud against Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C. (“H & R”) and Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellsehaft (“Volkswagen AG”), as well as claims for negligence, products liability and breach of warranty against Volkswagen AG. The district court held that all of the claims were time-barred and, in addition, found that the claims for negligence, products liability and breach of warranty were barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Plaintiffs now argue that the district court’s rulings were erroneous. We exercise jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re Courtesy Inns, Ltd., Inc., Debtor. Randolph F. Jones v. Bank of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- The Petromanagement Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Acme-Thomas Joint Venture and J.L. Thomas Engineering, Inc., an Oklahoma CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Knight v. Mooring Capital Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.