Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 2004No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0254PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, J.

¶ 1 After a bench trial, the trial court found appellant Tony Dewayne Smith guilty of possessmg a deadly weapon as a proMbited possessor in violation of A.R.S. § 13-3102 and sentenced him to a presumptive term of 4.5 years m prison. On appeal, Smith contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the handgun, assertmg that law enforcement officers unlawfully entered his home and conducted a search. We conclude the trial court failed to apply the correct standard in determinmg whether the officers had lawfully entered Smith’s residence, and we remand the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. GayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API