Legal Opinion

State v. Zamora

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 20, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 06-0894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KESSLER, Judge.

¶ 1 Juaquin Zamora (“Zamora”) appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree criminal trespass. The only issue on appeal is whether the superior court erred in denying Zamora’s motion to suppress evidence. In ruling on a motion to suppress evidence when police conduct a two-stage custodial interrogation, a court must determine whether inadmissible statements made to the police prior to Miranda 1 warnings taint statements made after those warnings or the use of a two-stage custodial interrogation was intended to avoid the purpose of those warnings. Missouri v.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  4. Jamie Aaron Kuhne v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  5. State of Arizona v. David J. WallerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API