Legal Opinion
United States v. Morales-Perez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 2006No. 05-10115PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel opinion filed on May 31, 2006, is withdrawn. A substitute opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order.
Judges O’Scannlain and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Goodwin so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. No further petitions for rehearing shall be entertained.
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Rodrigo Alejandro Morales-Perez (“Morales-Perez”) pled guilty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Jorge Valdavinos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- AFI Holding, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Gonzalez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Arthur L. HollisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.