Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur L. Hollis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2007No. 05-30611PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Arthur Hollis (Hollis) was sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment after a jury convicted him of distribution of cocaine base and maintaining drug-involved premises in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(A) and 21 U.S.C. §§ 856(a)(1) & (b), respectively. He challenges his conviction and his sentence, contending that evidence of sales by Hollis to a government informant prior to the charged sale should not have been admitted, that evidence seized from his apartment should have been suppressed, that the evidence that he used two apartments to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Halray Harman v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Salazar-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ShetlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AnchrumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.