Crossways Apartments Corp. v. Amante
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, J.:
As to the first cause of action the complaint seems to be little more than a demand for payment of a sum of money. The com*434plaint simply says in effect that there was a contract; that defendants failed to perform, and that plaintiff is entitled to damages for the breach. Few of the terms or conditions of the contract are given, and as to the nature of the breach nothing whatever is stated.
The agreement is alleged to be in writing, but the writing is not annexed, nor is the contract pleaded by alleging it according to its legal effect, namely, by setting forth so much of the terms and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Adams v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Minkin & HalperinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Lupinski v. Village of IlionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Marasco v. MorseNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Central Savings Bank v. Amted Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.