Wood Law Offices, LLC v. Il Nam Chang (In re Il Nam Chang)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Robert N. Opel, II, Bankruptcy Judge
The Chapter 13 Debtors’ former law firm filed an Adversary Proceeding objecting to the Debtors’ discharge citing § 727 of the Bankruptcy Code. For the reasons stated below, I will grant the Debtors/Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and allow the Plaintiff law firm twenty-one (21) days to file an amended conforming complaint.
I. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).
II. Facts and Procedural History
II Nam Chang and Chong Wol Chang…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Nicholson v. Ecast Settlement Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Law Office of Brandon A. Rotbart, P.A. v. SeraphinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025
- Weaver v. HartmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019