Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge
In this non-dischargeability action, the Chapter 13 Debtor moved to dismiss both counts of the Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, I will deny the Motion to Dismiss with respect to Count One which is based upon the 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) fraud exception. The Motion will be granted, with prejudice, with respect to Count Two which is grounded upon the 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4)2 fiduciary exception.
I. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SnowWolf v. IacovazziUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Trentzsch v. Trentzsch, IIIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019