Legal Opinion

Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2017No. CASE NO. 1-16-bk-02789 RNO; ADVERSARY NO. 1-16-ap-00141 RNOPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge

In this non-dischargeability action, the Chapter 13 Debtor moved to dismiss both counts of the Second Amended Complaint. For the reasons stated below, I will deny the Motion to Dismiss with respect to Count One which is based upon the 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) fraud exception. The Motion will be granted, with prejudice, with respect to Count Two which is grounded upon the 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4)2 fiduciary exception.

I. Jurisdiction

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SnowWolf v. IacovazziUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. Trentzsch v. Trentzsch, IIIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API