Legal Opinion
Pfeiffer v. Integrated Fund Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 2005No. 04 Civ. 7915(DLC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
On October 6, 2004, plaintiff Milton Pfeiffer (“Pfeiffer”), a shareholder of the Bjurman, Barry Micro Cap Growth Fund (the “Fund”), filed the instant action, alleging that defendants Integrated Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrated”), Scott A. Engle-hart (“Englehart”), and Tina H. Bloom (“Bloom”) (collectively the “Integrated Defendants”) violated Section 36 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b), by receiving, or by approving the receipt of, “grossly inflated” administrative and transfer agent fees from the Fund. Pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Forsythe v. Sun Life Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Joseph Andrews, Connie Benham v. The City of Jacksonville, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018