Legal Opinion
Richard/Allen/Winter, Ltd. v. Waldorf
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 15, 1987No. 2-86-0119PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE LINDBERG
delivered the opinion of the court:
In a jury trial, counterdefendant, Richard/Allen/Winter, Ltd. (RAW), was found to have violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (ICFDBPA) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 121½, par. 262 et seq.), and the jury awarded $1,000 in compensatory and $1,000 in punitive damages for counterplaintiff Ronald V. Erickson (Erickson), and $0 for compensatory and $1,000 in punitive damages for counterplaintiff James A. Waldorf (Waldorf). RAW appealed the jury’s verdict. On appeal, RAW raises several issues. Given our…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Niven v. SiqueiraIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Duhl v. Nash Realty Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Broberg v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Finley v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Duran v. Leslie Oldsmobile, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Wheeler v. Sunbelt Tool Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Rubin v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.