Legal Opinion
Schalk v. Reilly
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 24, 1990No. Nos. 89-1141, 89-1276PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
David Schalk and Sara Frey brought separate citizens suit challenges to a consent decree entered into by Westinghouse and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to clean up hazardous waste sites in and around Bloomington, Indiana. The district court separately dismissed both cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Schalk and Frey appealed, and their cases were consolidated. We affirm.
I. Statutory Background
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- North Shore Gas Company v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Ronnie W. Carroll v. George E. DetellaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Boarhead Corporation v. Edwin B. Erickson, Region Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.