Frankel v. Arch Street Corp.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Kelley, J.,
This matter arises on defendant’s motion for judgment on. the pleadings. This case must be approached in the light of the well-established principle that a summary judgment should be entered on the pleadings only in a case that is clear and free from doubt: Dilks v. Flohr Chevrolet, 411 Pa. 425, 430 (1963); Rogoff v. Buncher Co., 395 Pa. 477, 480 (1959). It appears from the pleadings that plaintiff is the lessee of the first floor store of the premises located at 1232 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pa. Defendant is owner and lessor of this store. Plaintiff is engaged in the business of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Cannon v. BreschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Boyd v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Rogoff v. the Buncher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Ginko Associates, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007