Legal Opinion

Lundman v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1925No. 24,551PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Appeal by defendant from the order granting plaintiff a néw trial after an adverse verdict.

On January 31, 1923, an agent of defendant solicited plaintiff, who was in the jewelry business at Annandale, Minnesota, to take burglary insurance upon his goods when locked in the safe or vault in the store. Plaintiff was prevailed upon to accept such insurance to the extent of $2,000 for one year, the premium of $26.40 to be paid to the local agent at that place. No writing passed at that time, but the insurance was to be effective at once. A short time thereafter a policy was delivered. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Anchor Casualty Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Sanborn v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. Swedeen v. SwedeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Dayton Co. v. Carpet, Linoleum & Resilient Floor Decorators' UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API