Legal Opinion

Schrier v. San Mateo County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 1983No. Civ. 49986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

This appeal is from a.judgment denying a petition for writ of administrative mandamus brought by a medically retired deputy sheriff against the county retirement board, following the board’s determination that appellant was no longer disabled and that his disability pension be terminated pursuant to Government Code section 31730. We affirm and hold that Government Code sections 31729 and 31730 do not compel the continuance of a disability retirement if the retiree is substantially able to perform the duties of a given permanent assignment within the office or department in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Hudson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Davis v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Gilbert v. County of San Bernardino CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API