Legal Opinion

Watters v. Doud

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1981No. 46806-1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. —

Harry Watters appeals from a permanent injunction which limited the property upon which he could levy to satisfy a judgment entered against the community of Judith and Charles Doud. As to the Douds' family home, the injunction limited Watters to the equity in the home as of the date of the Douds' divorce. Charles Doud, on the other hand, cross-appeals the trial court's ruling that the declaration of homestead exempted only the postdivorce equity. We affirm the issuance of the injunction and, in light of the facts of this case, find it unnecessary to address the homestead issue.

This…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baffin Land Corp. v. MONTICELLO MOT. INN., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Jacobs v. HoittWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Rainier National Bank v. McCrackenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of America, NA v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Bank Of America v. Kenneth TreigerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API