Legal Opinion

Allen v. Forrest

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1894No. 1332PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King Cowvty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

— The plaintiff, claiming right to purchase certain tide lands under the act of March 26, 1890,. brought his action against the defendant, W. T. Forrest, commissioner of public lands, to restrain him from entering into a contract with one Eugene Semple, who had made application under the act of March 9, 1893, entitled ‘ ‘An act prescribing the ways in which waterways for the uses of navigation may be excavated by private contract, providing for liens upon tide and shore lands belonging to the state, granting rights-of-way across lands…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hutchings v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co. v. Seattle Construction & Dry Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co. v. Seattle Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Pelton v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Graham v. Great Falls Water Power & Townsite Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API