Legal Opinion

In re the Disability Proceeding Against Diamondstone

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2005No. 200,104-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Attorney Susan G. Diamondstone appeals the Washington State Bar Disciplinary Board’s (Board) recommendation that she be transferred to disability inactive status. The hearing officer and a unanimous Board found that the Washington State Bar Association (Association) has shown beyond a simple preponderance of the evidence, in fact by a clear preponderance of the evidence, that Diamondstone lacks the capacity to practice law.

Bridge, J.

¶2 Diamondstone contends that there is not sufficient evidence in the record to support the conclusion that she is incapable of practicing law. In addition she…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WWJ Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. WWJ Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. In Re Disability Proceeding Against DiamondstoneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bellevue School Dist. v. ESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API