Legal Opinion

Secrest v. Nobles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1924No. 14875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Wagoner County; Enloe V. Yemor, Judge. Action by James Secrest and William E. Long against James Nobles, B. Mobbs and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This is an action in ejectment to recover certain lands in Wagoner county, Okla., instituted in the district court of said county by James E. Secrest and William E. Long, plaintiffs, appellants herein, against James Nobles et al. The plaintiff Secrest deraigned his title and relied onj the deed from his coplaintiff, William E. Long. The answering defendant, B. Mobbs, who appears and adopted an answer and cross-petition of his brother, F. J. Mobbs, who was acting for the said B. Mobbs under power of attorney, relies on a deed from one G. D. Sleeper. A number of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Miller v. NannySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WirthleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Bernard v. McRaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boles v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Gaines Bros. Co. v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. In Re Dearborn's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. James v. WingateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Bunte v. HasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API