Legal Opinion

Boles v. Akers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1925No. 15320PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, 0.

This is an action by J. H. Akers against Z. D Boles and T. D. Wagner, wherein Akers seeks to recover an interest in an overriding royalty based on the interest of what is known as the Ellis 'estate.

There- was a motion filed by thé defendants to require the plaintiff to make his petition more definite and certain, which was sustained by the court, and the plaintiff filed his amended petition. The 4th paragraph of said amended petition sets out plaintiff’s case in the following language:

“The plaintiff alleges in his fourth paragraph, that he and T. D. Wagner and Z. L. Boles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hayden v. DannenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Secrest v. NoblesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Catron v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Teuscher v. GraggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. State Ex Rel. McCrory v. Bland.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API