Legal Opinion
Ohio County v. Baird
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1910No. 2,033PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky. Action by A. B. Baird against Ohio County, Ky. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Baird, a citizen and resident of Oklahoma, recovered, judgment in the court below against the county of Ohio, Ky., on the following instrument:
“On or before the first day of August, 1894, the Ohio county fiscal court and Ohio county promises to pay to the order of A. B. Baird at the Beaver Dam Deposit Bank five thousand eight hundred and ninety-two dollars and forty-three cents ($5,892.43), out of the first of the county levy of J894, collected by the sheriff of said county as per order of said court made at its January, 1904, term. Ohio County Fiscal Court; and
“Ohio…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claiborne County v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Birdsall v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Neill v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Perry County v. EngleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Jewell Belting Co. v. Village of BerthaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- La Polla v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF UNION CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Eaton v. Shiawassee CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Hickman County v. Nashville Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933