Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ostrow

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

Respondent here was attorney for deceased and in his behalf collected $8,000 as the proceeds of an action to recover for personal injuries to deceased. Respondent professes to have completely accounted for the fund in accordance with his retainer. The question presented is whether or not he still holds any funds of deceased.

Challenge is made by respondent to the court’s jurisdiction. That jurisdiction is sustained by Matter of Wilson (252 N. Y. 155). The money here reached respondent’s possession as the money of a chent held in trust. Respondent was entitled to have out of it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of UlrichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  3. In re the Estate of PatenotreNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of MinevitchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  5. In re the Estate of TheirichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API