Legal Opinion

People v. Kemppainen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 147PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to Houghton; Streeter, J. Bastardy proceedings against Peter Kemppainen. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Defendant was adjudged to be the father of an illegitimate child, before the circuit court for the county of Houghton, and to stand charged with its maintenance until it arrived at the age of 14 years. The order and judgment provided for the payment of money, the furnishing of a bond, and other details usual in such cases, and, in default of compliance therewith, he to be committed to jail until such bond was given. A motion for a new trial was denied, and the case was removed by defendant to this court for review upon writ of certiorari. Sixty days after the return to the writ was made to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. LombardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Wilson v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. State Ex Rel. Clements v. Durham's AdministratorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Myers v. HarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Schumm v. BeeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Pryor v. JumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. State ex rel. Wilkes v. BrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gross v. VanLerbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API