Legal Opinion

Myers v. Harrington

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1925No. Docket No. 2864PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action is based upon section 196a of the Civil Code and is prosecuted for the purpose of securing a judgment or decree providing for the maintenance of an illegitimate minor child out of the estate left by its putative father. A demurrer, filed by the defendants to the plaintiff’s complaint, was sustained without leave to amend, and from the judgment entered, following the sustaining of the demurrer, the plaintiff appeals.

The allegations of the complaint are to the effect that the plaintiff, Jack Myers, is an illegitimate child of Edward B. Myers and one Norine Vaughn; that the said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dyer v. DyerWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Clark v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Poland v. PolandWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McKenzie v. LombardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Perez v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Edelman v. EdelmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API