Legal Opinion

Schumm v. Beery

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1950No. Civ. 17445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The only question here for decision is whether a filiation proceeding under section 196a of the Civil Code survives the death of the putative father.

Johan Schumm, an infant, through his guardian ad litem, complained that he is the illegitimate son of Gloria Schumm and one Wallace Beery and demanded judgment against his alleged father for $700 per month for permanent support. Before the proceeding could be tried, Wallace had winged his way to the world beyond. Thereupon Johan moved the court to substitute the executors of Mr. Beery’s estate as defendants. Such motion having been denied, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kirschner v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Newman v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Industrial National Bank v. IseleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  3. Banks v. McMorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Bullock v. J.B.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Gross v. VanLerbergCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API