Keyes v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bice county, BucTcham, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a verdict of $250 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to recover damages for injuries ■sustained by plaintiff in his person and property, and caused by an obstruction (a barbed-wire fence) which it is alleged defendant unlawfully and negligently placed across a public road, and with which plaintiff collided while lawfully driving along such highway. It .will be observed that the gist of plaintiff’s cause of action against defendant is not mere negligence, — that is, negligently doing an otherwise lawful act, — but the doing of an act which it had no right to do at all, —viz., obstructing a public highway. This eliminates from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Johnson v. Inhabitants of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Brown v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Streett v. LaumierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
- Sherman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Braun v. CravenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- J & D Towing, LLC v. American Alternative Insurance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.