Langton Lime & Cement Co. v. Peery
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofb.owrow, Judge. Two actions to foreclose mechanic’s liens were commenced by the Langton Lime & Cement Company, one against Joseph S. Peery and his 'wife, and the other against Elias Wesley Smith, in both of which the Walker Stone Company became a party defendant and asserted mechanic’s lien claims against the property. From judgment sustaining the Walker Stone Company’s lien, the owners appeal. appellant’s points.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. C. Loofb.owrow, Judge. Two actions to foreclose mechanic’s liens were commenced by the Langton Lime & Cement Company, one against Joseph S. Peery and his 'wife, and the other against Elias Wesley Smith, in both of which the Walker Stone Company became a party defendant and asserted mechanic’s lien claims against the property. From judgment sustaining the Walker Stone Company’s lien, the owners appeal. appellant’s points. Where there is a valid contract between the owner and ■contractor, such contract is the measure of the owner’s liability.…
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The Langton Lime & Cement Company, a corporation, commenced two actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens. The first action was commenced against one O. M. Engdahl, contractor, and said Peery as owner of a certain building and the real *115estate upon which the same is situated, and against a number of other lien claimants whom it is not necessary to enumerate here; and the second one was commenced against said Engdahl as contractor and said Smith as the owner of a certain other building and the real estate on which the same is situated, and against other lien claimants whom it is not necessary to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mannix v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Quist v. SandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Allen v. GarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yost Ex Rel. Yost v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Castle v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Badertscher v. Independent Ice Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- State Bank of Beaver County v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Gill v. TracyUtah Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.