Legal Opinion

State Bank of Beaver County v. Mortensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1925No. 4282PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, C. J.

On December 11, 1919, the defendants H. J. Mortensen and H. C. Rowley made and delivered to plaintiff, State Bank of Beaver County, their certain ñve promissory notes, for $590 each. The notes were payable in one, two, three, four, and five years, respectively, after date. None of the notes was paid. On January 24, 1922, after maturity of two' of the notes, this action was instituted. Five separate causes of action are stated in the complaint. The five notes made by Mortensen and Rowley are the basis of the several causes of action. Personal judgment is sought on the notes against the makers.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Langton Lime & Cement Co. v. PeeryUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Plough v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kline v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mickelson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. HafenUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Salina Canyon Coal Co. v. KlemmUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Gill v. TracyUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API