Legal Opinion
Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided March 7, 2000No. Civ. 99-000335SPKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case involves the Right to Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.S.C. § 3401 et seq. (“RFPA”). Plaintiff Marshall Kenneth Flowers (“Flowers”) contends that Defendant First Hawaiian Bank (“First Hawaiian”) violated the RFPA when it revealed financial information about Flowers and his wife under a subpoena in a military Article 32 proceeding, but did not give him notice as set forth in the RFPA. First Hawaiian moves for judgment on the pleadings, asserting that Flowers fails to state a claim. First Hawaiian…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Peggy J. Neece Buel H. Neece v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America United States of America First National Bank of Turley, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 15, 1986. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Velasquez-Campuzano v. Marfa Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield BranchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Flowers v. First Hawaiian BankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Flowers v. First Hawaiian BankDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Roberts v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000