Legal Opinion
Fullerform Continuous Pipe Corp. v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 25, 1968No. Civ-6324-PHXPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO USE HEREIN CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS PREVIOUSLY TAKEN IN THE NO-JOINT CASES
PENCE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this treble damage antitrust action1 have moved the court for an order “allowing and authorizing” plaintiffs’ use of depositions of twenty-six (26) witnesses previously deposed in the so-called No-Joint cases.2 The No-Joint cases were similar private antitrust actions brought by manufacturers of cast-in-place pipe to recover alleged damages from some of the same defendants as herein. The depositions in question3 were taken during the course of pre-trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hertz v. GrahamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Rivera v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- First National Bank in Greenwich v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Alfio Batelli v. Kagan and Gaines Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hicks Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Ikerd v. LapworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Rule v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local Union No. 396Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Related Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Matter of Estate of EliasenIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.