Legal Opinion
Hertz v. Graham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 25, 1958PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
In the course of a pre-trial conference held pursuant to Rule 16 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the attorneys for the plaintiff requested a ruling that certain depositions taken in a prior action and certain testimony given in that action might be offered in evidence in the present action. This was a proper matter to come up in a pre-trial conference under the provisions of subdivision (6) of Rule 16, for the determination of this point might well determine whether further discovery proceedings should be instituted and whether the case is in fact ready in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Rivera v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- First National Bank in Greenwich v. National Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. v. GumbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hicks Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Ikerd v. LapworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Rule v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local Union No. 396Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Frederick H. Hope v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., the Hearst Corporation and Igor CassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In Re Related Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.