Legal Opinion

Scott v. Burton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1851PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Houston. Suit on a promissory note. Verdict for the defendant, and judgment that the defendant recover his costs.

1Opinion of the Court

IIbmphill, Ch. J.

This suit was brought on a promissory note. The jury found for the defendant, and judgment was entered that he should recover his costs in that behalf expended. The cause has been argued, and au opinion on the points discussed was in course of preparation when it was discovered that no final judgment had been entered.

That the defendant should recover his costs is not a judgment which determines the matter in controversy for the defendant. The jury had found in his favor, or, in other words, that the plaintiff was not entitled in law to a recovery, and the judgment following…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Mak-Saw-Ba Club v. CoffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Welch v. County Court of Wetzel CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Tourtelot v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Fitzgerald v. Evans & HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1880

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API