Legal Opinion

Shore v. Shore

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1954No. L. A. 23024, 23025Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 Cal.2d 677 (1954)

ARCHIE B. SHORE, Respondent,

v.

ALBERTA MAE SHORE, Appellant.

L. A. Nos. 23024, 23025.

Supreme Court of California.

Dec. 3, 1954.

Siemon & Siemon and Alfred Siemon for Appellant.

Kendall & Howell and William A. Howell for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

Archie B. Shore brought these actions to establish his title to an undivided one-half interest in certain real and personal property in the possession of defendant Alberta Mae Shore and to secure a partition of the personal property. The actions were consolidated for trial. In her answers, Alberta pleaded that Archie's actions were barred…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API