Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Tannenbaum

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.

This is an action to reform a policy. Reformation is prima facie difficult only because it is hard to analyze what the theory of the action is. In every written contract there must be a previous oral contract, i. e., a meeting of the minds before the signatures are affixed. The written contract completely wipes out the oral. There is a presumption that no matter what the parties orally agreed, they agreed on what the writing said. When a plaintiff asks reformation he must overcome that by clear and convincing evidence. If there is any fraud in misrepresenting what the contract was, the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Small v. WeissbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  2. Edwards v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Walbern Press, Inc. v. Willow & Reed, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API