Legal Opinion
Small v. Weissberg
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 12, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Starke, J.
In this jury action, plaintiffs, business brokers, seek to recover a commission, not because of having effected a sale of anything to the defendants, but because of a provision in an instrument labeled as a “ contract ’ ’ containing this provision: “ I, said prospective purchaser also agree that if I am introduced to other prospective purchasers by the broker and I and such other prospective purchaser or purchasers, purchase a business or any interest in a business, either in our individual names or purchase the same through the medium of a corporation or the stock of a corporation, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Nau v. Vulcan Rail & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Hartigan v. . Casualty Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Brainard v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- McKenna v. MeehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raoul v. Olde Village Hall, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Walbern Press, Inc. v. Willow & Reed, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Resnick v. Keystone Sportswear Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1958