Legal Opinion
Edwards v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 19, 1958No. Claim No. 33850; Claim No. 33849PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell Gr. Hunt, J.
These two claims involve an identical issue and they differ only slightly in their facts. The sole issue is the construction to be given to the provisions of four contracts respecting claimants’ fees. The claims were tried together upon a single record. Such was the stipulation. The claimants do not contend that they ought to be paid for services as for breach of contract. They contend simply that there is a balance owing to them, under the contract, for the services they performed. The State raises no question about the services having been completed, expertly and well.
The claimants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Heller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Gram v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Belmar Contracting Co. v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Friedman v. HandelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward C. Flaherty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
- Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960